INTEGRATED WILDLIFE HABITAT RANKING SYSTEM (IWHRS) COMPOSITE FOR FLORIDA - 2009

Metadata also available as

Metadata:

Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Publication_Date: 2010
Title:
INTEGRATED WILDLIFE HABITAT RANKING SYSTEM (IWHRS) COMPOSITE FOR FLORIDA - 2009
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data
Other_Citation_Details: State of Florida
Online_Linkage:
<http://myfwc.com/research/gis/data-maps/terrestrial/wildlife-habitat-ranking-system/>
Description:
Abstract:
+The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) is responsible for performing environmental reviews of major land developments in Florida that impact fish and wildlife resources and their habitat. In an effort to improve the efficiency and accuracy of these assessments, and to improve the coordination between agencies, the FWC developed a Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based rapid assessment tool that incorporates a wide variety of land cover and wildlife species data. The Integrated Wildlife Habitat Ranking System (IWHRS) ranks the Florida landscape based upon the needs of wildlife as a way to identify ecologically significant lands in the state, and to assess the potential impacts of land development projects. The IWHRS was originally created in 2001 (original IWHRS) and was revised in 2007,2008, and in 2009. This dataset is an expanded version of the IWHRS_2009 grid and contains the values of the 10 data layers that comprise the IWHRS 2009. Values for Roadless Habitat Patch Size, Listed Species Locations, Species Richness, Managed Lands, Distance to Managed Lands, Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) Habitat Conservation Priorities, and Florida Forever Board of Trustees/Save Our Rivers Lands, as well as the final IWHRS calculated values, are included in this dataset.
Purpose:
The IWHRS is provided as part of the FWC's continuing technical assistance to various local, regional, and state agencies and entities interested in wildlife needs and conservation in order to: (1) determine ways to avoid or minimize project impacts by evaluating alternative placements, alignments, and transportation corridors during early planning stages, (2) assess direct, secondary, and cumulative impacts to habitat and wildlife resources, and (3) identify appropriate parcels for public land acquisition for wetland and upland habitat mitigation purposes. Predictions suggest that the size of new managed lands and their proximity to existing managed areas can be critical to the maintenance of their species diversity and persistence.
Supplemental_Information:
Prior to July 1, 2004, the Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI) was known as the Florida Marine Research Institute (FMRI). The institute name has not been changed in historical data sets or references to work completed by the Florida Marine Research Institute. The institute name has been changed in references to ongoing research, new research, and contact information.
The IWHRS was originally created in 2001 and underwent a major revision in 2007 using updated datasets. In 2008 changes were made to five of the data layers (Listed Species Locations, Species Richness, Managed Lands, Distance to Managed Lands, and Florida Forever Board of Trustees/Save Our Rivers Lands) using data not available in 2007, and the Landscape Diversity layer was replaced with a Spatial Heterogeneity layer. In 2009, the binary Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas (SHCA) layer was replaced with a prioritized SHCA layer and all other layers except Spatial Heterogeneity and Landscape Connectivity were updated with data not available in 2008.
For more inforrmation on the Integrated Wildlife Habitat Ranking System see <http://myfwc.com/research/gis/data-maps/terrestrial/wildlife-habitat-ranking-system/>.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2009
Currentness_Reference: publication date
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -87.429040
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -79.872251
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 30.983191
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 24.492815
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: NONE
Theme_Keyword: IWHRS, wildlife habitat
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: biota
Access_Constraints:
Available without restriction. All data must be verified by Principal Investigator or Group Database Analyst prior to release. It is strongly recommended that this data is directly acquired from FWC and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. FWC makes no claims as to the data's suitability for other purposes.
Use_Constraints:
Acknowledgement of the FWC-FWRI (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission-Fish and Wildlife Research Institute) as the data source would be appreciated in any products developed from these data, and such acknowledgment as is standard for citation and legal practices for data source is expected by users of this data. Please cite the original metadata when using portions of the record to create a similar record of slightly altered data, such as reprojection. If any data are modified or adjusted, please share the edited information with FWC. Users should be aware that comparison with other data sets for the same area from other time periods may be inaccurate due to inconsistencies resulting from changes in mapping conventions, data collection, and computer processes over time. FWC shall not be liable for improper or incorrect use of this data. These data are not legal documents and are not to be used as such. This is not a survey data set and should not be utilized as such. These data are not to be used for navigation.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: GISLibrarian
Contact_Organization: FWC and Wildlife Research Institute
Contact_Position: GIS Data Librarian
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: Fish and Wildlife Research Institute
Address: 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 727-896-8626
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 727-893-1679
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: GISLibrarian@MyFWC.com
Hours_of_Service: 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Eastern time
Data_Set_Credit: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Security_Information:
Security_Classification_System: FWRI-DC
Security_Classification: Available without restriction
Security_Handling_Description: Available without restriction
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 3; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.3.1.4000
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Other_Citation_Details:
The Integrated Wildlife Habitat Ranking System 2009 website: <http://myfwc.com/research/gis/data-maps/terrestrial/wildlife-habitat-ranking-system/>
The Integrated Wildlife Habitat Ranking System 2009 Final Report: <http://myfwc.com/media/1205697/IWHRS_09.pdf>
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
GeoPlan relied on the integrity of the attribute information within the original data.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Logically consistent. All attribute values fall within defined values
Completeness_Report:
Visually inspected for completeness to ensure all values fell within speciified ranges and all pixel cells were classified
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
This data is provided 'as is' and its horizontal positional accuracy has not been verified by GeoPlan
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
This data is provided 'as is' and its vertical positional accuracy has not been verified by GeoPlan
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Scale_Denominator: Unknown
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FWC
Source_Contribution: Spatial and Attribute Information
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
For a complete description on the process steps and methodology please see the final report availble for download at <http://myfwc.com/> media/1205697/IWHRS_09.pdf
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
GeoPlan downloaded this dataset from FWC's Integrated Wildlife Habitat Ranking System 2009 website at:<http://myfwc.com/research/gis/data-maps/terrestrial/> wildlife-habitat-ranking-system/ on 7/19/2011.The dataset was archived with several other datasets in .ZIP format. The archive was named data.zip. The iwhrs_comp09 raster was extracted and the following QA/QC steps were performed by GeoPlan.
- Added the DESCRIPT field based on IWHRS_CLS. - Added the FGDLAQDATE field based on the date GeoPlan acquired the data from the source.
Process_Date: 110727
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster
Raster_Object_Information:
Raster_Object_Type: Grid Cell
Row_Count: 24531
Column_Count: 24903
Vertical_Count: 1
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Map_Projection:
Map_Projection_Name: Albers Conical Equal Area
Albers_Conical_Equal_Area:
Standard_Parallel: 24.000000
Standard_Parallel: 31.500000
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -84.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 24.000000
False_Easting: 400000.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.002048
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.002048
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: D_North_American_1983_HARN
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: IWHRS09_COMP
Entity_Type_Definition: IWHRS09_COMP.VAT
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Rowid
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: VALUE
Attribute_Definition: unique value
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: COUNT
Attribute_Definition: numbers of cells for each value
Attribute_Definition_Source: program generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: DISTTOMANAGED
Attribute_Definition:
The distance to managed lands data layer was constructed by performing a find distance query in ArcGIS on the FNAI FLMA database. From the results, the range of values was divided into 10 discrete categories using natural breaks. Values assigned to pixels were inversely proportional to the distance to managed lands, (e.g. a pixel with a value of 10 falls in the closest interval to managed land, 9 is the next interval outward from managed land land, and so forth until the outermost interval).
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FFBOT_SOR
Attribute_Definition:
Florida Forever Board of Trustees lands serve to conserve and protect unique natural areas, endangered species, unusual geologic features, wetlands, and archaeological and historical sites. Save Our Rivers lands conserves lands for water management, water supply, and the conservation and protection of water resources, and wildlife. For the FFBOT/SOR data layer, lands identified on either of these lists were given a value of 10 where all other areas were given a value of 0. Overlaps with existing managed areas were eliminated from the analysis.
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FNAI
Attribute_Definition:
The FNAI conservation needs assessment layer contains six priority classes. The classes prioritize habitats throughout Florida based on number of rare species and those species with the greatest conservation need. We reclassified the six FNAI conservation needs assessment priority classes on a 0 to 10 scale as follows:0: No priority, 2: Priority 6 habitats, 3: Priority 5 habitats, 5: Priority 4 habitats, 7: Priority 3 habitats, 8: Priority 2 habitats, 10: Priority 1 habitats
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: GREENWAYS
Attribute_Definition:
To include landscape connectivity in the IWHRS 2009, we utilized the results of the Florida ecological greenways network and critical linkages prioritization results (Florida Geographic Data Library 2007). We reclassified the six prioritization classes on a 0 to 10 scale as follows: 0: No linkage, 2: Low priority linkage, 3: Moderate-low priority linkage, 5: Moderate priority linkage, 7: High priority linkage, 8: Very high priority linkage, 10: Critical priority linkage
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC, UF
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: HETEROGENEITY
Attribute_Definition:
This layer measures the spatial complexity and variability of habitat patches in the state of Florida. The spatial heterogeneity analysis only includes natural land cover types from the FWC 2003 landcover image. Any open water, disturbed communities, agriculture, exotic plants, urban, and mining landcover categories were excluded. Due to computer processing limitations landcover classes were grouped to seven general categories. To represent the number of patch types we ran a Variety moving window analysis in ArcGIS using a 570 m (19 pixels) window. 570 m as a radius gets as close to a 100 ha circle as possible given 30 m pixel intervals in the landcover image. We then ran a Maximum Zonal Statistic in ArcGIS to obtain the maximum variety value for each patch. The resultant layer attributes each patch with the highest number of different patches within 570 m. To represent proportion of each type we used Fragstats and performed Simpson?s Evenness Index (SIEI) landscape analysis. Then using zonal statistics in ArcGIS, we obtained the mean SIEI value for each patch. To represent the spatial arrangement of patches we used Fragstats and performed a patch analysis using the Mean Proximity Index. To represent patch shape we used Fragstats and performed a patch analysis using the Fractal Dimension analysis. To represent the contrast between neighboring patches we used Fragstats and performed a patch analysis using the Edge Contrast Index. To obtain our final spatial heterogeneity layer we first transformed any of the intermediate data layers that were non-normally distributed. Next, we standardized the data ranges between the intermediate layers so that all were on a 0 to 1 scale and then added all layers together to obtain our measure of spatial heterogeneity. The range of values was divided into 10 discrete categories using a quantile methodology, the higher the value in the spatial heterogeneity layer the more heterogeneous the patch.
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LISTEDSPECIES
Attribute_Definition:
Using wildlife potential habitat maps for listed species created by the FWC, the data layer was classified based on the presence, number, and level of imperiled status for listed species present. The ranking scheme of the coverage is given below:0: No listed species present, 1: 1 species of special concern, 2:> 2 Species of Special Concern,3: 1 Threatened species and < 1 Species of Special Concern, 4: 1 Threatened Species and > 2 Species of Special Concern, 5: 2 Threatened Species and < 1 Species of Special Concern, 6: 2 Threatened Species and > 2 Species of Special Concern, 7: > 3 Threatened Species and > 0 Species of Special Concern, 8: 1 Endangered Species and > 0 Threatened Species and > 0 Species of Special Concern, 9: 2 Endangered Species and > 0 Threatened Species and > 0 Species of Special Concern, 10: >3 Endangered Species and > 0 Threatened Species and > 0 Species of Special Concern
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: MANAGEDLANDS
Attribute_Definition:
To construct the public lands data layer, all public lands identified in the FNAI FLMA database were given a value of 10; all other areas were classed 0.
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: PRIORITYSHCA
Attribute_Definition:
We used the prioritized SHCA dataset in the Wildlife Habitat Conservation Needs in Florida report (Endries et al. 2009) and reclassified the five SHCA priority classes on a 0 to 10 scale as follows:0: No SHCA, 2: Priority 5 SHCA, 4: Priority 4 SHCA, 6: Priority 3 SHCA, 8: Priority 2 SHCA, 10: Priority 1 SHCA
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ROADLESSPATCH
Attribute_Definition:
We used the FWC 2003 land cover image to identify habitat statewide. We updated the 2003 land cover image with a 2008 developed lands dataset. To construct the data layer for roadless habitat patch size, the hybrid FWC 2003/2008 land cover image was reclassified so that only categories representing natural land cover habitat (values 1 to 26) were identified and grouped into single-value continuous patches. To ensure that all major roads were accurately represented as sectioning the landscape, the April 2008 version of the Florida Department of Transportation Roads Characteristics Inventory (RCI) dataset (Florida Department of Transportation 2008) was converted into a 30 m grid where all road networks were given a value of NoData and all other areas were given a value of 0. Next, an addition calculation was performed with the reclassed land cover image and RCI grid. The resulting grid represents native vegetation patches as a single value and all non-native vegetation and road areas as no data. We calculated the total area of each continuous patch by performing a region group analysis, which clusters each patch and identifies the total number (count) of pixels per patch. Habitat patches were ranked using a 10 class quantile classification scheme due to the large size range of the parcels (from 0.15 km2 to 3490 km2). The quantile classification method identifies class cut-off values so that the total area of land in each class is approximately the same. Scoring was as follows: 0: < 0.15 km2, 1: 0.15 km2 to 2.22 km2, 2: 2.22 km2 to 8.87 km2, 3: 8.87 km2 to 21.24 km2, 4: 21.24 km2 to 43.69 km2, 5: 43.69 km2 to 76.80 km2, 6: 76.80 km2 to 124.87 km2, 7: 124.87 km2 to 209.08 km2, 8: 209.08 km2 to 442.89 km2, 9: 442.89 km2 to 1070.73 km2, 10: > 1070.73 km2
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SPRICHNESS
Attribute_Definition:
To model biodiversity for the species richness data layer, we utilized the potential habitat maps of 95 wildlife species that were created by the FWC and merged all species maps into a single layer. A pixel?s value represents a classification of the number of species identified as having potential habitat at that site. The range of values was 0 (representing no species) to 21 species overlapping in a single pixel. We classified the final layer using a 10 class quantile classification scheme. The classification values are given below:0: No species present, 1: 1 species, 2: 2 species, 3: 3 species, 4: 4 species, 5: 5 species, 6: 6 species, 7: 7 species, 8: 8 species, 9: 9 - 10 species, 10: >11 species
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: CUMM_VALUE
Attribute_Definition:
Represents the cummulative total of the values from the 10 layers. Ranges from 1 to 87.
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: IWHRS_CLS
Attribute_Definition:
The final calculation was then classified using a 10 class scheme. The resulting value assigned to each pixel indicates its importance to wildlife (e.g. the higher the value of a pixel the more important it is to wildlife).1: 1 to 10, 2: 11 to 18, 3: 19 to 26, 4: 27 to 34, 5: 35 to 42, 6: 43 to 49, 7: 50 to 55, 8: 56 to 60, 9: 61 to 66, 10: 67 to 87
Attribute_Definition_Source: FWC
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: DESCRIPT
Attribute_Definition: GeoPlan added field based on the field VALUE.
Attribute_Definition_Source: GeoPlan
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FGDLAQDATE
Attribute_Definition: The date FGDL acquired the data from the source.
Attribute_Definition_Source: GeoPlan
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: GISLibrarian
Contact_Organization:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission-Fish and Wildlife Research Institute
Contact_Position:
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: 431 Architecture PO Box 115706
Address: 431 Architecture PO Box 115706
City: Gainesville
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 32611-5706
Country: United States
Contact_Voice_Telephone:
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone:
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: Web site: <http://www.fgdl.org>
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: Technical Support: <http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfeed.html>
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: For FGDL Software: <http://www.fgdl.org/software.html>
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
FGDL Frequently Asked Questions: <http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfaq.html>
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: Mailing list for FGDL: <http://www.fgdl.org/fgdl-l.html>
Hours_of_Service:
Contact_Instructions:
Resource_Description: DOWNLOADABLE DATA
Distribution_Liability:
The Florida Geographic Data Library is a collection of Geospatial Data compiled by the University of Florida GeoPlan Center with support from the Florida Department of Transportation. GIS data available in FGDL is collected from various state, federal, and other agencies (data sources) who are data stewards, producers, or publishers. The data available in FGDL may not be the most current version of the data offered by the data source. University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no guarantees about the currentness of the data and suggests that data users check with the data source to see if more recent versions of the data exist.
Furthermore, the GIS data available in the FGDL are provided 'as is'. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no warranties, guaranties or representations as to the truth, accuracy or completeness of the data provided by the data sources. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no representations or warranties about the quality or suitability of the materials, either expressly or implied, including but not limited to any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center shall not be liable for any damages suffered as a result of using, modifying, contributing or distributing the materials.
A note about data scale:
Scale is an important factor in data usage. Certain scale datasets are not suitable for some project, analysis, or modeling purposes. Please be sure you are using the best available data.
1:24000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the county level. 1:24000 data should NOT be used for high accuracy base mapping such as property parcel boundaries. 1:100000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the multi-county or regional level. 1:125000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the regional or state level or larger.
Vector datasets with no defined scale or accuracy should be considered suspect. Make sure you are familiar with your data before using it for projects or analysis. Every effort has been made to supply the user with data documentation. For additional information, see the References section and the Data Source Contact section of this documentation. For more information regarding scale and accuracy, see our webpage at: <http://geoplan.ufl.edu/education.html>
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Transfer_Size: 325.814
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: <http://research.myfwc.com/>
Fees:
None. However, persons or organizations requesting information must provide transfer media if FTP is not available and must pay express shipping costs if express shipping is required.
Ordering_Instructions:
Contact GIS Librarian by e-mail, telephone, or letter explaining which products are needed and providing a brief description of how the products will be used. Also, provide name and address of the person or organization requesting the products.
Turnaround:
Usually within 10 business days, although, complex requests may take longer
Custom_Order_Process: Contact GIS Librarian
Technical_Prerequisites:
This data is intended for use with a Geographic Information Systems or Remote Sensing software package.
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20111122
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission-Fish and Wildlife Research Institute
Contact_Person: GISLibrarian
Contact_Position: GIS Data Librarian
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: Fish and Wildlife Research Institute
Address: 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 727-896-8626
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 727-893-1679
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: GISLibrarian@MyFWC.com
Hours_of_Service: 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Eastern time
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Access_Constraints: No restrictions on metadata
Metadata_Use_Constraints: Metadata must be distributed with the data set.
Metadata_Security_Information:
Metadata_Security_Classification_System: FWRI-MC
Metadata_Security_Classification: Available
Metadata_Security_Handling_Description: Metadata must be distributed with the data set.
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage:
<http://www.ncddc.noaa.gov/metadataresource/metadata-references/files/ncddcmdprofile_v2.pdf>
Profile_Name:
Content Specification for Metadata in the National Coastal Data Development Center's Data Catalog Version 2.0
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: <http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html>
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: <http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html>
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile
Generated by mp version 2.9.6 on Tue Nov 22 13:21:46 2011